Shila vs Siege Media
In AI SEO & GEO Agencies, Shila holds position 1 and Siege Media position 3. Both work with SaaS companies. Their published stacks have no tool in common. Shila publishes a starting price of $3,000; Siege Media publishes one of $5,000.
Side by side
| Fact | Shila | Siege Media |
|---|---|---|
| HQ | Lisbon, Portugal | Austin, United States |
| Founded | 2026 | 2012 |
| Team | 2-10 | 51-200 |
| Pricing | From $3k | From $5k |
| Starting price | $3,000 | $5,000 |
| Pricing model | Project | Project |
| Stack | Google Search Console, Slack | Not published |
| Industries | SaaS, Agencies | SaaS, Financial Services, Ecommerce, Healthcare, Real Estate |
| AI SEO & GEO Agencies | #1 of 32 | #3 of 32 |
| Third-party ratings | ||
| Best for | Early-stage SaaS founders who want AI search visibility as a bounded project with a published price, rather than an open-ended retainer. | Established brands with a real content operation that want AI answer visibility handled by the same team running their SEO and digital PR. |
Ratings are published by the sources named and are shown as each source displays them. AI Agency Radar does not combine them into a score of its own, and positions come from the published criteria alone.
Our verdict on Shila
Shila is the most legible offer in this category: one published price, one fixed scope, a weekly deliverable you can point at, and a money-back guarantee on the first two weeks of it.
The main caution: Founded in 2026 with seven reviews, so the track record is measured in months, not years.
Our verdict on Siege Media
Siege is the lowest risk buy in this ranking for a company that wants competent execution rather than a research partner.
The main caution: GEO is 35% of an existing SEO practice, so the core disciplines remain content marketing and conventional search.