The Best AI Voice Agencies in 2026

Ranking updated 26 October 2026Ratings checked 26 October 202620 agencies reviewedHow we rank

The three highest-ranked AI voice agencies are Softcery, Gearvox and deepsense.ai. Of the 20 agencies ranked, 10 publish a starting price, from $1,000 to $50,000, and the rest quote on request. A published third-party rating backs 10 of them. Positions were last recalculated on 26 October 2026.

AI voice agencies build systems that hold a phone conversation: answering, qualifying, booking, escalating to a person when the call needs one. It is the hardest category on this site to buy well, because a demo that sounds good in a browser tells you almost nothing about how the same system behaves on a real phone line under load.

The distinction that matters is between firms that engineer the call layer and firms that resell a platform. The first group can tell you their latency budget, how they handle a caller interrupting mid-sentence, and what happens when a carrier drops a leg of the call. The second group configures a vendor's dashboard. Both can be the right buy; the price should not be the same, and the listings below say which is which.

RankAgencyBest forHQTeamPricing
1 No change since 21 October 2026 Softcery Top choice Teams that treat a phone line as production infrastructure and want latency, evaluation and monitoring specified before launch rather than discovered afterwards. Tallinn, EE 11-50 From $10k
2 No change since 21 October 2026 Gearvox Top choice Franchise networks and field service operators that need an agent wired into a dispatch system, and can work with pricing quoted per call rather than as a project fee. Seattle, US Not published Mixed
3 New in this ranking deepsense.ai An enterprise with $25,000 or more that wants production LLM agents, voice agents or RAG systems built by a large engineering team with partner status verified at Anthropic and OpenAI. Warsaw, PL 51-200 From $25k
4 Down 1 place since 21 October 2026 DestiLabs Buyers who want a latency figure and a cost per connected minute in writing early, and who do not need to know which infrastructure the work runs on. Tallinn, EE 11-50 From $10k
5 Down 1 place since 21 October 2026 Master of Code Global Enterprise teams that want an agent running in production with orchestration, tool access and tracing named up front, and a fixed-budget pilot before committing to a full build. Redwood City, US Not published From $25k
6 New in this ranking Softblues A UK or Irish mid-market company that wants help choosing and rolling out Claude, Copilot or Gemini, starting with a discovery priced at £2,000 to £12,000. London, GB 11-50 From $3k
7 Down 2 places since 21 October 2026 Call Sandwich Contact centers and enterprises with an existing PBX or dialer that need an agent placed inside the estate they already run rather than a replacement for it. Thousand Oaks, US Not published Undisclosed
8 Down 2 places since 21 October 2026 Azumo Cost-sensitive US buyers whose AI project is mostly conventional engineering with a model in the middle of it, starting at a $10,000 minimum. San Francisco, US 51-200 From $10k
9 New in this ranking MindTitan A European or public-sector organization with $50,000 or more that wants AI strategy work or a custom forecasting, computer vision or conversational model built by a data science team. Tallinn, EE 11-50 From $50k
10 Down 3 places since 21 October 2026 Tempo Flows Technical buyers able to judge a build proposal on its engineering merits, who are willing to take on a supplier with no public track record. Las Vegas, US Not published Undisclosed
11 No change since 21 October 2026 Sidetool Companies already buying automation or internal tools from a well-reviewed studio, who want a voice agent added by a team that already knows their systems. Doral, US Not published $50-$99/hr
12 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 RaftLabs Companies that need a price agreed before work starts, and are buying product engineering with a voice component rather than a voice specialist. Dublin, IE Not published From $10k
13 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Solven Service businesses losing bookings to unanswered and after-hours calls that want named comparable clients and a fast path to a live line. AU Not published Undisclosed
14 New in this ranking Talk AI An Australian real estate, finance or clinic business buying paid leads that wants them called within seconds and old leads reworked, run as a managed service. Melbourne, AU Not published Undisclosed
15 Down 5 places since 21 October 2026 HAKOBY AI A trades business losing after-hours calls that wants a phone agent booking into ServiceM8, Jobber or Housecall Pro within days. Brooklyn, US Not published Project
16 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Iffort AI Buyers who want transfer and routing behaviour designed properly by a certified firm, and who do not need the supplier to own realtime infrastructure. Noida, IN 11-50 Undisclosed
17 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Reprise AI A home services operator that wants an after-hours voice agent wired into ServiceTitan, at a price agreed before the work starts. Tampa, US Not published From $5k
18 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Agento AI Intake-heavy businesses that want a receptionist or qualification agent running quickly on a rolling agreement, and are buying an outcome rather than an architecture. Not published Not published Undisclosed
19 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Kingstone Systems Small clinics, brokerages and rental businesses that want a phone receptionist deployed and looked after, and can accept a supplier built around one named individual. Not published Not published Undisclosed
20 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026 Samcom Technologies Buyers with their own technical lead who need SIP and VoIP engineering hours on a voice build, and are comfortable directing an hourly offshore team. Ahmedabad, IN Not published From $1k

Order follows one score with four parts: specialization fit (25%); demonstrated client work, technical depth, pricing transparency and public accountability (30% together); third-party ratings weighted by source and review count (30%); and credentials assessed by someone other than the agency (15%, counted only where it lifts the score). Every listing states at least one drawback. No agency pays to appear or to rank. Full methodology.

Every agency in the ranking

One paragraph on each: who it suits and the main caution. The full review, with every pro and con, is on the profile.

1 No change since 21 October 2026

Softcery

Best forTeams that treat a phone line as production infrastructure and want latency, evaluation and monitoring specified before launch rather than discovered afterwards.

Top choice

Softcery is the reference point for what a serious voice engagement should disclose before anything is signed.

The main cautionPublishes no price of its own, so the only planning figure is the $10,000 minimum Clutch displays

HQ
Tallinn, Estonia
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $10k $10,000+ minimum, $50-$99/hr (Clutch-displayed); own site sells advisory on an availability retainer, build work per statement of work, and operations on a retainer, with no figures published
Stack
  • LiveKit
  • WebRTC
  • Daily
  • SIP/PSTN
  • Twilio
  • Telnyx
  • Plivo
  • Deepgram
  • AssemblyAI
  • Gladia
  • Speechmatics
  • Whisper
  • Cartesia
  • ElevenLabs
  • PlayHT
  • Rime
  • Pipecat
  • Vapi
  • Retell
  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • MCP
2 No change since 21 October 2026

Gearvox

Best forFranchise networks and field service operators that need an agent wired into a dispatch system, and can work with pricing quoted per call rather than as a project fee.

Top choice

Gearvox is one of the few voice specialists in this ranking that will tell you whose phones it answers, which makes far more of its claims checkable than is normal here.

The main cautionAlmost all published work is franchise operations and field service, with no evidence of delivery outside it

HQ
Seattle, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
Mixed Prices per call or per booking, tied to the value of a customer call, and describes the model as pay for performance; no figure and no minimum are published
Stack
  • Twilio
  • Deepgram
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic Claude
  • Retell AI
  • Salesforce
  • Stripe
  • HubSpot
  • Zapier
  • Slack
  • Calendly
  • Cal.com
  • Playwright
3 New in this ranking

deepsense.ai

Best forAn enterprise with $25,000 or more that wants production LLM agents, voice agents or RAG systems built by a large engineering team with partner status verified at Anthropic and OpenAI.

deepsense.ai suits an enterprise with $25,000 or more that wants production LLM agents, voice agents or RAG systems built by a large, experienced engineering team.

The main cautionEvery agent and LLM result is published for an unnamed client, so none can be checked against a reference without asking; the named results with figures are computer vision and reinforcement learning.

HQ
Warsaw, Poland
Team
51-200
Pricing
From $25k Directory figures only: Clutch shows a $25,000+ minimum and $100-$149 an hour. Publishes no prices on its own site; its Anthropic partner page describes a Jumpstart package of 80 engineering hours with no price.
Stack
  • OpenAI
  • ChatGPT Enterprise
  • Codex
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • ElevenLabs
  • LangChain
  • LangGraph
  • AWS Bedrock
  • Google Cloud Vertex AI
  • Ray
  • Microsoft Fabric
4 Down 1 place since 21 October 2026

DestiLabs

Best forBuyers who want a latency figure and a cost per connected minute in writing early, and who do not need to know which infrastructure the work runs on.

DestiLabs gives a buyer two of the three numbers that decide a voice project, latency and cost per connected minute, and pairs them with the larger of the two 5.0 Clutch scores on this page.

The main cautionNames no telephony, speech or orchestration vendor anywhere, so the published latency cannot be tied to a stack

HQ
Tallinn, Estonia
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $10k $10,000+ minimum, $50-$99/hr (Clutch-displayed); DesignRush instead shows a $10,000-$25,000 minimum and $70/hr
5 Down 1 place since 21 October 2026

Master of Code Global

Best forEnterprise teams that want an agent running in production with orchestration, tool access and tracing named up front, and a fixed-budget pilot before committing to a full build.

Master of Code Global is the right choice if you want an agent in production rather than a proof of concept, and you want to see how it will be debugged before you sign: it names LangFuse as its tracing layer alongside LangChain, LlamaIndex, MCP, Bedrock and Vertex, and it runs its own open source orchestration framework.

The main cautionChatbot and conversational AI account for 40% of technical focus per Clutch; autonomous multi-step agent work is a newer extension of a conversation design practice

HQ
Redwood City, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $25k $25,000+ minimum project, $50-$99/hr (Clutch-displayed); sells a fixed-budget 30-day AI pilot with a four to five person team, price not published
Stack
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic/Claude
  • LLM-Orchestrator (own open-source framework)
  • MCP
  • Microsoft
  • AWS
  • Claude (Anthropic)
  • Google Vertex
  • AWS Bedrock
  • LangChain
  • LlamaIndex
  • LangFuse
  • LOFT (proprietary framework)
  • Twilio
  • Genesys
  • NICE
  • Avaya
  • Amazon Connect
  • Amazon Lex
  • Amazon Polly
  • Amazon Transcribe
  • Google Dialogflow
  • Azure Speech
  • AWS Lambda
  • Zendesk
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
6 New in this ranking

Softblues

Best forA UK or Irish mid-market company that wants help choosing and rolling out Claude, Copilot or Gemini, starting with a discovery priced at £2,000 to £12,000.

Softblues suits a UK or Irish mid-market company that wants help choosing and rolling out Claude, Copilot or Gemini, starting from a discovery engagement priced on its own site.

The main cautionOnly 2 of 32 Clutch reviews concern AI work, both from late 2025; the other 30 describe the web and WooCommerce business it was from 2020 to 2023, so the 5.0 rating says little about AI delivery.

HQ
London, United Kingdom
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $3k Publishes discovery prices on its own site: Mapping and Strategy at £2,000 to £5,000 and Full Discovery with a business case at £7,000 to £12,000. Build work is quoted per engagement; Clutch shows a $10,000+ minimum and $50-$99 an hour.
Stack
  • Claude
  • Microsoft 365 Copilot
  • ChatGPT
  • Gemini
  • Google Cloud
  • HubSpot
7 Down 2 places since 21 October 2026

Call Sandwich

Best forContact centers and enterprises with an existing PBX or dialer that need an agent placed inside the estate they already run rather than a replacement for it.

For a buyer whose problem is a working contact center that now needs an AI agent inside it, Call Sandwich is the clearest fit on this page: it is the only firm here shipping a product whose job is to bridge an existing PBX to an agent.

The main cautionNames no client anywhere and anonymizes its testimonials, so 200 enterprise clients and 10 million calls rest on its own word

HQ
Thousand Oaks, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • Jambonz
  • SIP
  • PSTN
  • Asterisk
  • FreeSWITCH
  • ViciDial
  • 3CX
  • NICE inContact
  • Avaya
  • Talkdesk
  • Genesys
  • Five9
  • LiveVox
  • RingCentral
  • Amazon Connect
  • Twilio
  • Telnyx
  • Vonage
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • GoHighLevel
  • Zoho
  • Pipedrive
  • Keap
  • Zapier
  • Make
  • n8n
  • Epic
  • Dentrix
  • ChiroTouch
  • ServiceTitan
8 Down 2 places since 21 October 2026

Azumo

Best forCost-sensitive US buyers whose AI project is mostly conventional engineering with a model in the middle of it, starting at a $10,000 minimum.

Azumo is a sensible nearshore partner for a US buyer whose AI work is mostly conventional engineering with a model in the middle of it, and who wants the lowest rate band available in this ranking.

The main cautionAI development is 35% of the service mix per Clutch, and the firm positions as a general nearshore software partner rather than an agent specialist

HQ
San Francisco, United States
Team
51-200
Pricing
From $10k $10,000+ minimum, $25-$49/hr (Clutch-displayed); Clutch review data shows engagements from roughly $4,200 to $70,000+. DesignRush separately shows a $50,000+ minimum and $55/hr
Stack
  • LiveKit
  • Deepgram
  • ElevenLabs
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic Claude
  • LangChain
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Zendesk
  • ServiceNow
  • Intercom
  • WhatsApp
9 New in this ranking

MindTitan

Best forA European or public-sector organization with $50,000 or more that wants AI strategy work or a custom forecasting, computer vision or conversational model built by a data science team.

MindTitan suits a European or public-sector organization with $50,000 or more that wants AI strategy or a custom forecasting, computer vision or conversational model from an experienced data science team.

The main cautionMost of its reviewed and published work is classic ML, computer vision and intent-based chatbots; LLM agent evidence is a September 2026 Clutch review and a 2024 exam assistant, with no agent case study.

HQ
Tallinn, Estonia
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $50k Directory figures only: Clutch shows a $50,000+ minimum and $50-$99 an hour. Publishes no prices on its own site.
Stack
  • ChatGPT
  • GPT
  • DALL-E 2
  • Intel Xeon
10 Down 3 places since 21 October 2026

Tempo Flows

Best forTechnical buyers able to judge a build proposal on its engineering merits, who are willing to take on a supplier with no public track record.

Read the service pages and Tempo Flows sounds like one of the more capable firms in this category; try to check anything and there is nothing to check.

The main cautionNames no client, no case study and no team member, so none of the technical claims can be checked

HQ
Las Vegas, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed No pricing published; states a delivery arc of architecture review, system design, build, hardening and evaluation, then launch and operate, at roughly six weeks to production
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • Twilio
  • Telnyx
  • Vonage
  • SIP
  • SIP REFER
  • Asterisk
  • FreeSWITCH
  • RingCentral
  • Genesys
  • Five9
  • Talkdesk
  • Amazon Connect
  • NICE
  • ViciDial
  • LiveVox
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • GoHighLevel
  • Zoho CRM
  • Stripe
  • Shopify
  • QuickBooks
  • Calendly
  • Supabase
  • n8n
  • Make
  • Zapier
  • Slack
  • Microsoft Teams
11 No change since 21 October 2026

Sidetool

Best forCompanies already buying automation or internal tools from a well-reviewed studio, who want a voice agent added by a team that already knows their systems.

Sidetool is a well-reviewed automation and Bubble studio that added voice recently, and this ranking reflects that order.

The main cautionNot one published case study involves a phone call

HQ
Doral, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
$50-$99/hr Own site sells a flat monthly subscription for unlimited queued automations with no figure published; Clutch shows a $10,000+ minimum project size and $50-$99/hr
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • Vapi
  • n8n
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic Claude
  • LangChain
  • Bubble
12 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

RaftLabs

Best forCompanies that need a price agreed before work starts, and are buying product engineering with a voice component rather than a voice specialist.

RaftLabs is the clearest firm on this page about what a project will cost, and for a buyer who needs a number approved before a scoping call, that counts for something real.

The main cautionIts own copy claims a 4.9 rating across 50 or more verified reviews, while the Clutch profile it cites displays 20

HQ
Dublin, Ireland
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $10k Fixed-price only, no hourly billing: single-workflow agent $20,000-$50,000 over 4-8 weeks, multi-agent systems $60,000-$150,000 over 10-16 weeks, MVP work from about $10,000; Clutch shows a $10,000+ minimum and $25-$49/hr
Stack
  • Twilio
  • ElevenLabs
  • Deepgram
  • Vapi
  • Retell
  • n8n
  • Zapier
  • Make
  • AWS
  • Google Cloud
  • Kubernetes
13 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Solven

Best forService businesses losing bookings to unanswered and after-hours calls that want named comparable clients and a fast path to a live line.

Solven suits a service business with a straightforward problem: calls are going unanswered and bookings are being lost.

The main cautionPublishes no latency, telephony or interruption-handling detail, and names no infrastructure beyond CRM connectors

HQ
Australia
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • Zapier
  • GoHighLevel
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • monday.com
  • Zoho CRM
  • Microsoft 365
14 New in this ranking

Talk AI

Best forAn Australian real estate, finance or clinic business buying paid leads that wants them called within seconds and old leads reworked, run as a managed service.

Talk AI suits an Australian business buying paid leads in real estate, finance or healthcare that wants every lead called within seconds and its dead leads reworked, without building the system itself.

The main cautionEffectively no outside record: one rating-only Google review, an empty Trustpilot profile, and nothing on Clutch, G2 or DesignRush.

Offices
Sydney, Australia and Gold Coast, Australia
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed Publishes no prices; quotes on request. Its site offers the first 3,000 calls free for a limited time and guarantees a 10% lift in 30 days or no payment.
15 Down 5 places since 21 October 2026

HAKOBY AI

Best forA trades business losing after-hours calls that wants a phone agent booking into ServiceM8, Jobber or Housecall Pro within days.

HAKOBY AI is worth a call for a trades business that wants its phone answered tonight rather than a project that lands next quarter.

The main cautionPublishes no address, founding year or team size. The Brooklyn location appears only on Retell's partner directory.

HQ
Brooklyn, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
Project
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • ServiceM8
  • Jobber
  • Housecall Pro
16 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Iffort AI

Best forBuyers who want transfer and routing behaviour designed properly by a certified firm, and who do not need the supplier to own realtime infrastructure.

Iffort AI earns a conversation from any buyer who cares about what happens when a call has to leave the agent, because transfer and routing behaviour is where most voice deployments embarrass their owners, and it is the part this firm writes about in operating detail rather than in features.

The main cautionDelivery rests on a single platform vendor, with no owned realtime infrastructure

HQ
Noida, India
Team
11-50
Pricing
Undisclosed
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • Twilio
  • Vonage
  • Supabase
  • Zoho CRM
  • HubSpot
  • Zendesk
  • GoHighLevel
  • Make
  • Zapier
  • Calendly
17 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Reprise AI

Best forA home services operator that wants an after-hours voice agent wired into ServiceTitan, at a price agreed before the work starts.

Reprise AI suits a home services operator that wants an after-hours voice agent wired into ServiceTitan and priced before the work starts.

The main cautionAll eight published case studies anonymize the client, so no figure can be traced to a named business.

HQ
Tampa, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $5k Published on its own site: $5,000-$15,000 consulting over 2-4 weeks, $15,000-$50,000 implementation over 4-8 weeks, $50,000-$150,000 transformation over 8-16 weeks, with no platform fee.
Stack
  • ServiceTitan
18 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Agento AI

Best forIntake-heavy businesses that want a receptionist or qualification agent running quickly on a rolling agreement, and are buying an outcome rather than an architecture.

Agento AI is buying-an-outcome territory. The volume recorded on its platform vendor's directory is the largest shown there for any partner on this page, the named client organizations are checkable, and 30-day rolling agreements after a two to three week implementation is a low-commitment way to find out whether a voice agent works on an intake line.

The main cautionPublishes nothing technical: no latency, no telephony detail, no interruption handling and no call testing method

HQ
Not published
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed Custom pricing scoped per engagement, a stated two to three week implementation and 30-day rolling agreements; no figures published
Stack
  • Retell AI
  • OpenAI
  • n8n
  • Salesforce
  • AWS
19 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Kingstone Systems

Best forSmall clinics, brokerages and rental businesses that want a phone receptionist deployed and looked after, and can accept a supplier built around one named individual.

For a clinic or a small brokerage, Kingstone offers two things the larger firms on this page do not bother with: named comparable clients at the same scale, and a written agreement about what the agent will and will not do before it goes live. The exposure is concentration.

The main cautionOnly one person is named on the entire site, with no team size, founding year or address published, which is real key-person risk

HQ
Not published
Team
Not published
Pricing
Undisclosed
Stack
  • Vapi
  • ElevenLabs
  • Twilio
  • Salesforce
  • HubSpot
  • Calendly
20 Down 4 places since 21 October 2026

Samcom Technologies

Best forBuyers with their own technical lead who need SIP and VoIP engineering hours on a voice build, and are comfortable directing an hourly offshore team.

On paper Samcom has telephony depth that several higher-ranked firms lack, and it is one of very few agencies in this category willing to publish what an hour of its time costs.

The main cautionIts site advertises a Clutch score of 4.9 from 74 reviews, while the Clutch profile for this company displays zero reviews

HQ
Ahmedabad, India
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $1k Publishes hourly rates: VoIP developer $25-$55/hr, AI developer $35-$75/hr, VoIP support engineer $18-$38/hr; Clutch shows $25-$49/hr and a $1,000+ minimum project size
Stack
  • LiveKit
  • Vapi
  • Retell AI
  • Pipecat
  • Asterisk
  • FreeSWITCH
  • Kamailio
  • OpenSIPS
  • FreePBX
  • VitalPBX
  • Vicidial
  • 3CX
  • Amazon Connect

Frequently asked

Which is the best AI voice agency right now?

As of 26 October 2026, Softcery holds first place in this ranking, with Gearvox second and deepsense.ai third. The order follows the five published criteria and is recalculated with every ranking run, so the names change when the evidence does. No agency pays to appear or to rank.

What actually makes an AI voice agent hard to build?

Latency and interruption. A human notices a pause beyond roughly 800 milliseconds, and that budget has to cover speech recognition, the model, and speech synthesis together, over a phone connection you do not control. Handling a caller who talks over the agent, transferring a live call with context intact, and failing over gracefully when a carrier drops a leg are all engineering problems that a platform demo never shows you.

How do I tell a voice engineering firm from a platform reseller?

Ask for their latency figures from production traffic, not a benchmark. Ask which telephony stack they use and whether they run their own session border controller. Ask what happens on interruption and how a warm transfer carries context. A firm that engineers the call layer answers these immediately; a reseller redirects to features.

What should an AI voice project cost?

Build costs in this ranking run from around $10,000 for a single well-scoped call flow to six figures for a contact centre integration. Per-minute running costs are separate and often matter more at volume, so ask for both. An agency that quotes a build price without asking your call volume has not thought about your running costs.

How much do these AI voice agencies charge to start?

Of the 20 agencies ranked, 10 publish a starting price, from $1,000 to $50,000, and the rest quote on request. The starting price is the cheapest way in that each agency publishes, which may be a small project, a workshop or a monthly retainer, and it is read from the agency's own site or its directory profile. Pricing transparency is one of the criteria, so an agency that publishes nothing scores lower on it; a low price on its own earns no position.