Ranking updated 26 October 2026Ratings checked 26 October 202617 agencies reviewedHow we rank
The three highest-ranked Claude partners are Shannon Advisory, Forgd and Simform. Of the 17 agencies ranked, 5 publish a starting price, from $1,250 to $25,000, and the rest quote on request. A published third-party rating backs 5 of them. Positions were last recalculated on 26 October 2026.
Claude partners are the consultancies and agencies that help a company put Anthropic's Claude to work: rolling out Claude Enterprise or Claude Code to a team, building agents and integrations on the Claude API, connecting Claude to company systems through MCP servers, and training the people who will use it. Anthropic opened the Claude Partner Network in March 2026, and its directory lists more than 300 firms in three tiers: Global Premier, which is the large system integrators and strategy houses, then Preferred and Select. Every firm ranked here is in that directory.
The tier tells you Anthropic has accepted the firm and, for the higher tiers, that it has certified staff and delivered Claude work. It does not tell you whether the firm has done your kind of project, so the ranking weighs published Claude work, named clients, outside reviews and how much of the firm is Claude work. The Global Premier firms, such as Accenture, Deloitte and PwC, are not ranked here; a buyer with that budget is already talking to them.
Companies that want senior AI engineers working inside their own team rather than a vendor delivering at arm's length, and that can run diligence without published pricing or reviews.
Large organizations running multi-year modernization programs that need a vendor able to pass enterprise procurement and security review.
Chicago, US
200+
Undisclosed
Order follows one score with four parts: specialization fit (25%); demonstrated client work, technical depth, pricing transparency and public accountability (30% together); third-party ratings weighted by source and review count (30%); and credentials assessed by someone other than the agency (15%, counted only where it lifts the score). Every listing states at least one drawback. No agency pays to appear or to rank. Full methodology.
Every agency in the ranking
One paragraph on each: who it suits and the main caution. The full review, with every pro and con, is on the profile.
Best forA small or midsize business that wants Claude set up, connected to its systems and taught to its staff by a firm that does nothing else.
Top choice
Shannon Advisory suits a small or midsize business that wants Claude set up, connected to its systems and taught to its staff by a partner that works with nothing else.
The main cautionFounded in 2026, with no outside reviews on any platform.
HQ
United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from under $25,000 up to $100,000; no prices are published on its own site. Each engagement is quoted after a free call, at a fixed scope and price.
Best forA private equity firm, portfolio company or insurer that wants Claude adopted across teams by a partner that works with nothing else.
Top choice
Forgd suits a private equity firm, portfolio company or insurer that wants Claude adopted across teams by a partner that works only with Anthropic.
The main cautionThe site names no founder, executive, office or address.
HQ
United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from $25,000 to $100,000 and up; no prices are published on its own site. Its AWS Marketplace listings are priced by private offer.
Simform makes sense when AI is one workstream inside a larger product engineering or cloud modernization program and you want a vendor with a long delivery history: 4.8 from 88 Clutch reviews is the second largest base on this page, and pricing is published at a $25,000 minimum with most projects between $50,000 and $199,999. As a dedicated agent partner it is a poor match.
The main cautionAI is 20% of a very broad engineering menu at a firm of 1,000 to 9,999 people, and agents are not named as a distinct practice at all
HQ
Orlando, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
From $25k$25,000+ minimum; $25-$49/hr; most common project $50,000-$199,999 (Clutch-displayed)
Workiflow suits a firm that wants monday.com and an AI assistant rolled out together, with the price known before work starts.
The main cautionOne outside review in total, on Trustpilot; no Clutch profile or Google listing.
HQ
United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $1kPublishes prices on its own site: fixed monday.com packages from $1,250 (an AI audit) through onboarding at $2,500 to $10,000 and migrations at $3,500 and $8,000, project hours at $225 to $275, and managed retainers from $5,000 a month.
Best forA healthcare or mid-market company that wants an aging system rebuilt with Claude Code, or its teams trained on Claude.
Blank Metal suits a healthcare or mid-market company that wants an aging application rebuilt with Claude Code, or its people trained on Claude by a team that uses it for most of its own engineering.
The main cautionFounded in 2025; the longer track record belongs to the founders' previous studio, GoKart Labs.
HQ
Minneapolis, United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from $25,000 to $100,000 and up; no prices are published on its own site.
BotsCrew is a sound choice when the automation problem is a conversation: support deflection, a voice agent, or a customer-facing assistant that has to hold up at volume, and it has run that kind of work at brand scale.
The main cautionNames no workflow or integration platform such as n8n, Make or Zapier anywhere in its public material, so back-office process automation is not a demonstrated capability
Best forA mid-sized or large company rolling Claude out to hundreds of staff that wants the training and the operating model built with it.
Tenex suits a mid-sized or large company rolling Claude out to hundreds of people that wants the training, the AI operating model and the first builds from one firm.
The main cautionFounded in 2025, with no reviews on Clutch, G2, Google or Trustpilot.
HQ
New York, United States
Team
51-200
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from $25,000 to $100,000 and up; no prices are published on its own site.
Aptitude 8 suits a company that runs on HubSpot and wants Claude connected to its sales and marketing work by a partner that knows the CRM in depth.
The main cautionOne of its two Claude cases is for hapily, a company run by Aptitude 8's own CEO, and the case does not say so.
HQ
Chicago, United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $5kDirectory figures only: G2 shows revenue operations as a service from $5,000 a month and Clutch a $5,000 minimum at $150-$199 an hour; no prices are published on its own site.
Best forA mid-market company that wants an AI roadmap and a first Claude build from a small senior team at a known price.
Eskridge suits a mid-market company that wants an AI roadmap and a first Claude build from a small senior team, at a price it can see before the first call.
The main cautionNo outside reviews on any platform.
HQ
Washington, United States
Team
2-10
Pricing
From $4kPublishes prices on its own site: retained advisory at $4,000 to $9,000 a month, an executive workshop at $15,000, strategy and roadmaps at $45,000 to $80,000, pilots at $50,000 to $90,000 and AI engineering at $80,000 to $120,000.
Best forCompanies already committed to AWS that want agentic systems built by a certified engineering team, rather than a standalone advisory engagement.
If your platform decision is already made and it is AWS, Caylent is one of the better verified engineering choices here, with partner awards and a certification count that are difficult to manufacture and Anthropic partner status on top.
The main cautionOwned by Gryphon Investors, which also owns phData in this same category, so the two are not independent alternatives
HQ
Irvine, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
MixedOwn site names two engagement structures, time and materials and a capacity pod model; no rate or minimum is published
Fast Slow Motion suits a small or mid-sized company on Salesforce or HubSpot that wants Claude connected to its CRM by a firm that already knows the CRM.
The main cautionG2 shows 0.5 from two reviews, one alleging slow, costly delivery and a billing dispute that went to legal threats.
HQ
Birmingham, United States
Team
51-200
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from under $25,000; no prices are published on its own site.
Best forCompanies modernizing onto Snowflake or AWS that want data engineering and managed operations, with a fixed-fee way to start.
phData is a serious data platform firm and its partner record, seven Snowflake Partner of the Year wins among them, is about as good a third-party signal as this category produces.
The main cautionOwned by Gryphon Investors, which also owns Caylent in this same category, so the two are not independent alternatives
Best forA company on AWS that wants Claude applications built on Amazon Bedrock by an established engineering consultancy.
Loka suits a company already on AWS that wants Claude built into an application on Amazon Bedrock by a consultancy with twenty years of engineering behind it.
The main cautionClaude reaches clients only through Amazon Bedrock; no Claude Code or Claude Enterprise program is offered.
HQ
Los Altos, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from $25,000 to $100,000 and up; no prices are published on its own site. Workshops are offered with AWS funding.
Best forA larger company that wants production agents built by forward-deployed engineers backed by a global consulting firm.
Artium suits a larger company that wants production agents built by forward-deployed engineers, with a global consulting firm behind them.
The main cautionOne published case names Claude; its deeper agent work, such as eBay, is on OpenAI.
HQ
Santa Monica, United States
Team
51-200
Pricing
UndisclosedDirectory figures only: Anthropic's partner directory lists budgets from $100,000 to $500,000 and up; no prices are published on its own site.
Best forData and analytics teams standardizing on Snowflake or Databricks that want AI strategy and engineering from a firm those vendors have vetted.
Aimpoint is the firm in this category whose capability is best attested by people other than itself, because vendor partner of the year awards are decided by companies that watch the delivery up close.
The main cautionNames no client and publishes no outcome, so demonstrated work rests entirely on vendor awards
Best forCompanies that want senior AI engineers working inside their own team rather than a vendor delivering at arm's length, and that can run diligence without published pricing or reviews.
Tribe AI is for a company that wants senior engineers working inside its own team rather than a vendor delivering from arm's length, and that is equipped to run its own diligence.
The main cautionPublishes no founding year, team size or price range, so the firm cannot be sized or budgeted before a sales conversation
Best forLarge organizations running multi-year modernization programs that need a vendor able to pass enterprise procurement and security review.
Thoughtworks is the right shape of vendor for a large organization running a multi-year modernization where the requirement is scale, geographic coverage and the ability to satisfy enterprise procurement.
The main cautionAt over 10,000 people this is a procurement-led purchase rather than a boutique engagement, and the pace and seniority of attention differ accordingly
As of 26 October 2026, Shannon Advisory holds first place in this ranking, with Forgd second and Simform third. The order follows the five published criteria and is recalculated with every ranking run, so the names change when the evidence does. No agency pays to appear or to rank.
What is the Claude Partner Network?
It is Anthropic's program for firms that implement Claude for other businesses, opened in March 2026. Partners get training, technical support and listing in Anthropic's public directory, which sorts them into three tiers: Global Premier for the largest integrators, then Preferred and Select. The directory shows each partner's budget bands, the company sizes it serves and how it delivers, and it does not publish ratings or reviews.
Do I need a Claude partner, or can my team roll Claude out itself?
A team can start using Claude the same day it buys seats. A partner earns the fee when Claude has to reach company data or systems, when agents will act without a person checking each step, when Claude Code is being rolled out to an engineering team with rules on what it may touch, or when several departments need training and a governance policy at once.
What does a Claude implementation cost?
Anthropic's directory shows each partner's budget bands, from under $25,000 for a focused build or rollout to above $2 million for enterprise programs. Most firms in this ranking take work under $100,000, and a first agent or a team rollout with training typically sits between $25,000 and $100,000. Few publish a price, so the listings say so where it applies.
How much do these Claude partners charge to start?
Of the 17 agencies ranked, 5 publish a starting price, from $1,250 to $25,000, and the rest quote on request. The starting price is the cheapest way in that each agency publishes, which may be a small project, a workshop or a monthly retainer, and it is read from the agency's own site or its directory profile. Pricing transparency is one of the criteria, so an agency that publishes nothing scores lower on it; a low price on its own earns no position.
Narrow this ranking
The same order, cut to the agencies that work with one sector or are based in one place.
We use Google Analytics to see which pages people read. It stores a cookie in your browser.
Nothing is stored unless you agree, and every page works either way.
What we collect.
