These are the 8 agencies in the directory closest to Jellyfish on category, industries, stack, team size and starting price, most similar first.
Jellyfish ranks #3 in AI Marketing Agencies. It quotes on request. Its best fit, in our words: Large advertisers that want media, creative and measurement from one global agency and need brand representation inside language models tracked as a reportable metric.
This listing is here for one reason and it is worth being direct about it: NinjaPromo publishes what it costs, in hours and rates, at every tier, and it has the largest verified review base in this category.
The main cautionNames no model, platform or proprietary product anywhere, so the AI marketing line is a label on a conventional full-service menu
HQ
London, United Kingdom
Team
200+
Pricing
From $4kPublished subscription tiers: $4,000/month for 40 hours, $7,200/month for 80, $12,800/month for 160, and $20,000-$100,000/month at enterprise scale
Best forAdvertisers that want performance media delivered by an independent agency and are willing to be early on its AI product suite.
Also ranked in AI Marketing Agencies; works with ecommerce businesses, financial services firms and SaaS companies.
Croud is a credible independent media agency that has built an AI product layer rather than renaming an old one, and BrandCI is a genuinely AI-specific deliverable rather than analytics with a new label on it.
The main cautionThe named AI suite launched in December 2025 on top of fourteen years of conventional performance marketing, so none of it has an external track record
Best forIn-house marketing teams that need creative produced with generative models at volume and can commit to an annual contract starting at $15,000 a month.
Also ranked in AI Marketing Agencies; works with ecommerce businesses, financial services firms and SaaS companies.
Superside is the clearest case in this category of an agency that changed how it works rather than how it describes itself: the deliverables it sells did not exist before generative models, and it will tell you what they cost before a call. Two things should give a buyer pause.
The main cautionClutch shows 2.9 out of 5 across six reviews, the lowest Clutch score in this category, with recurring project management and budget adherence complaints
HQ
Palo Alto, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
From $15kPublished tiers: Flex from $15,000/month on an annual commitment, Dedicated AI-Native Team from $30,000/month on a 12-month term, plus a $1,000/month software fee and a $20,000 three-week onboarding
Stack
Superspace (AI creative management platform)
Brand Brain (AI creative memory layer)
AI Briefing Agent
AI Insights Agent
Brand Models (custom image models trained on a client's visual style)
Brainlabs is worth a conversation if you are buying performance media at scale and want to interrogate how an agency tests things, because a logged experiment base is a rarer asset than another branded platform.
The main cautionBacked by private equity since 2023 and assembled from eight acquisitions, so the delivery team may come from an acquired shop rather than the group that built the tooling
HQ
New York, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
Undisclosed
Stack
Cortex AI (proprietary platform, stated as 32 in-house tools)
Hippocampus (proprietary repository of 2,500+ logged experiments)
Fractl is the most checkable of the genuinely AI-attentive agencies in this category. The review base is deep enough to mean something, the clients are named, and LLM answer visibility is a service line with tooling behind it rather than a claim on a homepage.
The main cautionSeveral of the named LLM tools read as descriptive labels rather than products, and no underlying model or vendor is disclosed
HQ
Delray Beach, United States
Team
51-200
Pricing
From $5k$5,000+ minimum; $100-$149/hr (Clutch-displayed); DesignRush states a $10,000-$25,000 minimum
Best forGrowth stage companies spending $20,000 a month or more that want answer engine optimization run alongside paid, lifecycle and content marketing.
Also ranked in AI Marketing Agencies; works with ecommerce businesses, financial services firms and SaaS companies.
NoGood suits a growth stage company that wants AI answer visibility handled by the same team running paid, lifecycle and content work, and it is one of the few agencies here that states what an engagement typically costs.
The main cautionThe AI search platform it leads with is described on its own site as a partnership, so a competitor could license the same capability
HQ
New York, United States
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $20kOwn site states an average retainer above $20,000/month
Stack
Goodie AI (answer engine optimization platform, described as a partnership)
Best forConsumer brands that need media mix modeling and first-party data infrastructure alongside paid media, and are buying the measurement rather than the AI layer.
Also ranked in AI Marketing Agencies; works with ecommerce businesses and SaaS companies.
This is a good performance agency with real data engineering and a deep review record, and it is also a clear example of the pattern that makes this category hard to read.
The main cautionOmega, the AI layer the agency leads with, launched by press release in August 2026 with no documentation, pricing or availability date
HQ
San Diego, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
From $5k$5,000+ minimum; $100-$149/hr (Clutch-displayed)
Stack
nova (first-party data platform built on Snowflake)
If what you need is econometric measurement and media buying at scale, Tinuiti is a serious agency and Bliss Point is a real product.
The main cautionBliss Point came from a 2019 acquisition and does econometrics; no generative AI product, named model or AI-attributed result is published
HQ
New York, United States
Team
200+
Pricing
From $10k$10,000+ minimum; $100-$149/hr (Clutch-displayed); DesignRush instead shows a $50,000+ minimum at $150/hr
Stack
Bliss Point (proprietary marketing operating system)
We use Google Analytics to see which pages people read. It stores a cookie in your browser.
Nothing is stored unless you agree, and every page works either way.
What we collect.