Jellyfish vs NoGood
In AI Marketing Agencies, Jellyfish holds position 3 and NoGood position 5. Both work with ecommerce businesses, financial services firms and SaaS companies. Their published stacks have no tool in common. Jellyfish quotes on request; NoGood publishes a starting price of $20,000.
Side by side
| Fact | Jellyfish | NoGood |
|---|---|---|
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | New York, United States |
| Founded | 2005 | Not published |
| Team | 200+ | 11-50 |
| Pricing | Undisclosed | From $20k |
| Starting price | Quotes on request | $20,000 |
| Pricing model | Not published | Retainer |
| Stack | Pencil (AI asset creation), Share of Model (tracks brand perception in LLMs), Now Next Soon (media plan simulation), J+ Bidding, Social Agents, Switchboard, J+ Scribe | Goodie AI (answer engine optimization platform, described as a partnership), Claude |
| Industries | Ecommerce, Financial Services, SaaS | SaaS, Healthcare, Ecommerce, Financial Services |
| AI Marketing Agencies | #3 of 22 | #5 of 22 |
| Third-party ratings | ||
| Best for | Large advertisers that want media, creative and measurement from one global agency and need brand representation inside language models tracked as a reportable metric. | Growth stage companies spending $20,000 a month or more that want answer engine optimization run alongside paid, lifecycle and content marketing. |
Ratings are published by the sources named and are shown as each source displays them. AI Agency Radar does not combine them into a score of its own, and positions come from the published criteria alone.
Our verdict on Jellyfish
For a large advertiser, Jellyfish is the option here that most convincingly does AI work rather than AI positioning: Share of Model is a reportable metric that did not exist before language models, and seven named AI products inside a four line service menu is a real allocation of engineering rather than a page on a website. The trade is control and cost visibility.
The main caution: Publishes no pricing at any tier, so an engagement cannot be sized before contact.
Our verdict on NoGood
NoGood suits a growth stage company that wants AI answer visibility handled by the same team running paid, lifecycle and content work, and it is one of the few agencies here that states what an engagement typically costs.
The main caution: The AI search platform it leads with is described on its own site as a partnership, so a competitor could license the same capability.