Atomic Actions vs NOA
In AI Automation Agencies, Atomic Actions holds position 3 and NOA position 17. In Zapier & Make Agencies, Atomic Actions holds position 1 and NOA position 5. They list no industry in common. Both build on Make, n8n, Airtable, HubSpot and 2 more tools. Atomic Actions publishes a starting price of $500; NOA publishes one of $5,000.
Side by side
| Fact | Atomic Actions | NOA |
|---|---|---|
| HQ | Alexandria, United States | Munich, Germany |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Team | 11-50 | 2-10 |
| Pricing | From $500 | From $5k |
| Starting price | $500 | $5,000 |
| Pricing model | Project | Not published |
| Stack | Make, Zapier, n8n, Airtable, HubSpot, Bubble, ClickUp, QuickBooks, Stripe, GoHighLevel, JotForm, Twilio, OpenAI, AWS, Laravel, NestJS, React, PostgreSQL | Make, n8n, Retool, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Notion, Airtable, Personio, Stripe, OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, Mistral |
| Industries | Agencies, Home Services, Real Estate, Service Businesses | Financial Services, SaaS |
| AI Automation Agencies | #3 of 43 | #17 of 43 |
| AI Agent Development | #9 of 41 | Not ranked |
| Zapier & Make Agencies | #1 of 31 | #5 of 31 |
| Third-party ratings | ||
| Best for | A small or mid-sized business that wants onboarding, invoicing or CRM workflows automated on Make or Zapier, starting from a published price of a few hundred dollars. | A German scale-up's operations team that wants processes automated on Make or internal tools built on Retool by a small partner that also trains its staff. |
Ratings are published by the sources named and are shown as each source displays them. AI Agency Radar does not combine them into a score of its own, and positions come from the published criteria alone.
Our verdict on Atomic Actions
Atomic Actions suits a small business that wants onboarding, invoicing or CRM workflows automated on Make or Zapier and wants to see a starting price before the first call.
The main caution: Founded in 2024, it uses two legal entity names on its own pages and publishes no street address, so the contracting entity needs confirming.
Our verdict on NOA
NOA suits a German scale-up whose operations team wants Make automations, Retool internal tools or low-code training from a small Munich partner.
The main caution: Only one of eleven case studies states an outcome figure; the rest describe what was built, and three are anonymized.