These are the 8 agencies in the directory closest to Nebor on category, industries, stack, team size and starting price, most similar first.
Nebor ranks #37 in AI Automation Agencies and #5 in AI Sales Agencies. It quotes on request. Its best fit, in our words: A European B2B company that wants a Clay-based outbound engine, ABM or CRM cleanup built inside its own accounts by a small hands-on team.
Best forA business of $1M-$20M in revenue that wants its team trained on Claude and ChatGPT and a paid AI operations plan, with small automations to follow.
Also ranked in AI Automation Agencies; works with other agencies and service businesses; both build on HubSpot, Slack, Claude and 1 more tool.
Ential suits a small business that wants its team trained on Claude and ChatGPT and a paid plan for where AI fits its operations, with small automations to follow.
The main cautionIts Google reviews are mostly about AI training events and workshops, and no review on any platform describes a delivered automation or agent build.
HQ
Brisbane, Australia
Team
2-10
Pricing
From $5kPublishes prices on its own site: the AI Operations Deep Dive at A$7,500 plus GST for teams of up to 15 people, and the Ential Marketing Hub at A$99 a month. Two-week build sprints are unpriced; Clutch shows a $5,000 minimum project at $200-$300 an hour.
Best forTeams that want a defined outbound system built, handed over and then run in house, rather than an agency running campaigns on their behalf.
Also ranked in AI Sales Agencies; works with SaaS companies and other agencies; both build on Clay, Instantly, HubSpot and 2 more tools.
Frontal is the cleanest answer in this ranking to the question a buyer should be asking, which is whether they end up owning anything.
The main cautionEvery published result is the agency's own unaudited figure, and its Clutch profile carries no reviews
HQ
Not published
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $5k$5,000+/month with a three-month minimum (Clay partner directory); a fixed-fee 90-day build followed by a month-to-month execution retainer, with figures scoped per engagement
Best forEuropean B2B companies that want a Clay and HubSpot outbound system built and their own staff trained to operate it afterwards.
Also ranked in AI Sales Agencies; works with SaaS companies and other agencies; both build on Clay, Lemlist, Instantly and 2 more tools.
Peakora suits a European buyer who wants the system built locally and then wants to run it in house, and the enablement and training line is the part that distinguishes it from firms that keep the keys.
The main cautionIts claim to be the first Clay Enterprise Partner in Europe is contradicted by Clay's own directory, which lists it at Studio tier
Best forTeams that want GTM engineering and outbound run as an ongoing subscription and do not need to own the system at the end of it.
Also ranked in AI Sales Agencies; works with SaaS companies; both build on Clay, Instantly, HubSpot and 3 more tools.
The engineering menu is credible and the tooling is more serious than the category average, with Snowflake and n8n sitting alongside the usual Clay and Apollo stack.
The main cautionPublishes no statement that the client owns what gets built, unlike its closest peers here
HQ
New York, United States
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $5k$5,000+/month with a three-month minimum (Clay partner directory); own site sells content and outbound as subscriptions and RevOps and ABM as sprints, with no figures published
Best forTeams that want outbound, enrichment and routing built in their own HubSpot or Salesforce, and that can accept a track record which is entirely self-published.
Also ranked in AI Sales Agencies; works with SaaS companies; both build on Clay, Lemlist, Instantly and 3 more tools.
The ownership statement is explicit and it is the reason this sits in the upper half. Work happens in the client's HubSpot or Salesforce, the client keeps it, and a 90-day pilot without a long lock-in is a reasonable way to test that before committing further.
The main cautionNo third-party review record exists on any permitted source, so every claim rests on the agency's own site
HQ
Not published
Team
Not published
Pricing
From $5k$5,000+/month with a three-month minimum (Clay partner directory), so roughly $15,000 committed; own site publishes no figures and offers a 90-day pilot without a long-term lock-in
Best forCompanies past roughly $1M in revenue that want a back-office process such as quote-to-cash, AR or client onboarding rebuilt, or a first production AI agent built at a published price, with hours saved measured afterwards.
Also ranked in AI Automation Agencies; works with other agencies; both build on HubSpot, Salesforce, Slack and 2 more tools.
2V Automation suits a mid-market operations lead with a defined back-office process to rebuild, or a smaller firm that wants a first production agent at a known price.
The main cautionThe review record is split by source. The 19 Clutch reviews, which are interview-verified, mostly cover app, UX and custom software work from before the 2023 change of focus; the automation work is reviewed on n8n's partner directory, where posting is open and the base is seven.
Offices
New York, United States and Lisbon, Portugal
Team
11-50
Pricing
From $2kPublishes two priced routes on its own site: Discovery Week at $2,000 for teams up to 20 or $4,000 for 21 to 50, refundable until it starts, with builds afterwards at $2,000 a week; and an agent track of a $2,000 workshop, a $7,000-$13,000 foundation build in 28 days, then $3,500+/month. Clutch shows $50-$99/hr and a $1,000+ minimum, and the n8n directory lists bands from $1,000-$5,000, the lowest each directory offers.
Best forA company that has settled on n8n and wants agents or workflows built and self-hosted by a small team that works on nothing else, with budgets from about $1,000.
Also ranked in AI Automation Agencies; works with SaaS companies and other agencies; both build on Claude.
n8n Lab suits a company that has settled on n8n and wants agents, voice agents or self-hosted workflows built by a small team that works on nothing else, at budgets from about $1,000.
The main cautionNo published location or legal entity: the site gives no address, entity or jurisdiction, and the only stated location is a Delaware registered-agent address on LinkedIn, so the listing carries no HQ.
HQ
Not published
Team
2-10
Pricing
From $1kDirectory figures only: Clutch shows a $1,000+ minimum and $50-$99 an hour, with most reviewed projects under $10,000. Publishes no prices on its own site.
Best forA UK professional services firm of 10 to 250 staff, in law, accountancy, financial advice or dentistry, that wants onboarding and compliance workflows automated on Zapier or HubSpot at a published price.
Also ranked in AI Automation Agencies; works with service businesses; both build on HubSpot, Salesforce and Slack.
OpsCopilot suits a UK law, accountancy, IFA or dental practice that wants onboarding and compliance workflows automated on Zapier or HubSpot at a price it can see first.
The main cautionVery young and hard to verify: the company was incorporated in July 2026, every case study is anonymized, and no client is named anywhere.
HQ
London, United Kingdom
Team
2-10
Pricing
From $1kPublishes prices on its own site: projects start at £3,500, most engagements run £3,500-£12,000, and Automation-as-a-Service retainers start at £950 a month. Zapier's directory lists a $500 minimum spend, and its profile text there says projects from $2,500.
We use Google Analytics to see which pages people read. It stores a cookie in your browser.
Nothing is stored unless you agree, and every page works either way.
What we collect.
